Théo Mercier, Skinless. © Erwan Fichou

review, article

Transforme Festival: Disturbing, but make it gentle

Read Icon Read
Time Icon Pink 8 min
Théo Mercier, Skinless. © Erwan Fichou
S pink identity

Performative transformations that are sometimes shaky, sometimes stirring

The result of a carefully calibrated alliance between the Fondation d’entreprise Hermès and four firmly established cultural institutions – Les Subsistances in Lyon, the Théâtre National de Bretagne, the Comédie de Clermont-Ferrand, and the Théâtre de la Cité internationale in Paris — Transforme Festival sets out a clear ambition: to provoke dialogue between disciplines, to hybridise forms, and to offer a stage responsive to the issues of our time. Always with impeccable scenography, and mainstreamed storytelling that knows exactly what it’s doing.

Amid this multidisciplinary programming, I chose to focus on three performance-based works that, without loudly declaring their radicalism, place the body at the heart of their language. These are not the only works worthy of attention, but they share something rare: a commitment to presence – immediate, lived, sometimes abrasive. They don’t just talk about embodiment, they put it to work.

Because Transforme, for all its airs of a sensitive laboratory, raises a very real question: what exactly is being transformed here? Our gaze? Our narratives? Our aesthetic frameworks? Or simply our tolerance for well-produced good intentions? Behind the words, the partnerships, and the polished visuals, it remains to be seen whether we’re witnessing a genuine shift – or just its carefully choreographed mise-en-scène.

Steven Cohen – Boudoir

The performance opens with a series of video capsules. Grotesque, kitschy, often literal. At one point, we find Cohen in a taxidermy workshop in South Africa, perched on a platform, heels seemingly fused with elephant hooves.
He drifts silently, expressionless. Others are present – artisans at work – yet the camera sees only him. A ‘Whites Only’ sign lingers in the background, an unsubtle symbol, while the only visible hands belong to racialised workers, reduced to functional presences. The body is here, yes – but that’s about it.

These capsules mix music, interview fragments, singing, and visual effects reminiscent of a Dior ad gone concept-heavy. It’s slick; maybe too slick.

Then we’re taken to a Jewish cemetery in Johannesburg. Cohen wears a costume bearing the infamous Nazi inscription Arbeit macht frei (work sets you free), performing atop his mother’s grave. The image is stark, frontal. Later, he’s shown at a concentration camp in France: barbed wire, crematoriums, Cohen lying still like a taxidermied relic. His costume catches fire, and then – a door opens. The audience is invited into the boudoir.

Or rather, a colonial death chamber disguised as a cabinet of curiosities: rugs made from animal hair, the neck of a giraffe, a baboon slouched in existential despair. Not exactly feng shui.

Enter Cohen – fluorescent dress, blacklight glow – emerging like some ghostly butterfly from a hidden door. He wanders, again. Pauses. Gestures. We’re back to the capsule’s rhythm, this time in real space.


Boudoir, by Steven Cohen. © Allen Thiebault
Boudoir, by Steven Cohen. © Allen Thiebault

The figure remains closed-off. Some might say mysterious. I was mostly bored. The dramaturgical device is clear from the first frame and doesn’t evolve. The silence, the frozen face, the repetition – all this locks the piece into a self-referential mechanism. The aesthetic unfolds, but never deepens. Presence is mimed, not lived.

We understand the work touches on Jewish identity or the idea that this personal history could become a collective future in a globalised world. But everything is filtered through a stylised frame that prefers control over emotional rupture. Symbols accumulate. The stage is saturated. And yet the body – the one that supposedly carries all this weight – seems oddly evacuated.

What might have been a searing traversal ends up as a meticulously lit display. A theatre of objects where the human becomes just another prop.

It’s undoubtedly refined. Intellectual. Elegant. Bourgeois. Elitist. But then again, so is the boudoir: a sealed-off room where one contemplates oneself, safely out of reach of the world.

Théo Mercier – Skinless

The performance begins before it begins. Under the glass roof of the École des Beaux-Arts, we walk through a landscape of crushed cans and household debris, so carefully arranged they start to sparkle. Detritus polished into sublimity.

Amid the trash: a statue. Something between a Roman ruin and a post-apocalyptic relic. Covered in trinkets, head wired with lamps, face blackened. It moves. Its gestures oscillate between feline stealth and robotic glitch. It picks up a bouquet of metal flowers – a relic, or an offering? – then vanishes. A red light rises. The audience is invited to relocate, navigating walls of waste to a cardboard-lined arena. Two figures emerge. Masked, nearly twins, crawling. They discover each other – or perhaps remember. Their embrace is both tender and uncomfortable: a love somewhere between fusion and incest.

The stage swallows them. The mechanical solo resumes: watching, pacing, haunting. Skinless resists interpretation – it lets images float.

The pair returns, trapped in a paper cave, eating literal pages. Digesting language. The image is beautiful – or unsettling. Or both.


Blue Quote Mark

The trash isn’t what we throw away – it’s what lingers when everything else is gone

Blue Quote Mark

The scenography (Mercier, Florent Jacob, François Boulet) surrounds without suffocating. We move, but never really escape. Everything is matter and metaphor – but mercifully, no one explains it. The piece doesn’t deliver meaning; it lets it leak.

Nothing is resolved, and nothing insists on being. In this world that smells of hot metal and cycles ending, the trash isn’t what we throw away – it’s what lingers when everything else is gone. Even love.

Marlène Saldana & Jonathan Drillet – Les Chats

Let’s be clear: Les Chats is a musical. So yes, there are songs, choreography, and tight costumes. Yes, there’s meowing. No, it’s not Cats. Well, not exactly. Think Cats on LSD with a political agenda.


Marlène Saldana & Jonathan Drillet, Les Chats – a musical, with Maman

We enter a plush, violently colourful world, something between a 90s kids’ TV set and an over-the-top art installation. Les Chats is also that: a storm of references – artistic, pop, political, theoretical – which you either follow or surrender to.

And so, the cats. Or rather, humans who act like cats. They scratch, they groom, they lick their paws. It’s funny. Sometimes it’s just weird. The feline is merely a pretext. Its mystery, its solitude, its wildness, replaced by anthropomorphic banter. You’re basically watching a bunch of roommates on MDMA in a velvet cage.

And you laugh. Honestly, at first. It’s absurd, the rhythm holds. Then one cat sings. Operatic voice, satirical monologue. The tone tilts. Soon they’re all talking. About climate, geopolitics, AI, collapse. Like a panel of pundits in a litter box.

Then comes the twist: they’re all living in a palace. Well-fed, pampered, protected by their owner — ‘Maman’. Who turns out to be Marine Le Pen. Yes, that one. The far-right French politician famously obsessed with cats. Suddenly the show flips from surreal farce to feline dystopia.

The idea is brilliant. And gutsy – especially for a publicly funded production. Turning Le Pen into a domestic deity in a post-apocalyptic musical is bold. The issue is that everything gets the same treatment. Everyone has a monologue. Topics roll out like an all-you-can-eat buffet. You sample, you forget.

Musically, it’s… varied. From operetta to eco-pop jingles. Some voices land, others wobble. You find yourself praying for the chorus to end. No real earworms – but hey, they tried.

Choreographically, we’re in old-school modern jazz territory, with nods to Broadway. Technique varies wildly. Some turns are executed with faith, more than balance. Is it a choice? Who knows.

What works is the acting. The cast goes all in. They claw through the absurdity and deliver performances that hover between critique and camp with admirable conviction.

But the show tries to say everything, and ends up digging into nothing. From feminism to poetry, from speciesism to migration – all in one meow. The cats become what they mock: noisy opinion machines with nothing left to say.
And yet, one can’t help but admire the nerve. It names things. It pushes buttons. That’s already something.

What’s left of these cats? A political plush toy, a few off-key moments, and the haunting image of a world where even animals do stand-up about the apocalypse. Maman would be proud.


At the end of this journey, one thing is clear: Transforme does transform – but perhaps not where it thinks. What shifts isn’t always the artistic experience itself, but the vocabulary, the packaging, the carefully crafted narrative around hybrid forms and so-called committed gestures. We evoke dissonance – in perfect harmony. We celebrate disruption – with full lighting control.

This isn’t a call for more risk, or a longing for some elusive sense of authenticity – we know how easily that becomes another trap. It’s about paying attention to where transformation actually happens. Not always on stage, but in the machinery around it: the curatorial language, the institutional frameworks, the aesthetics of progressiveness. The apparatus grows more flexible in form – blending genres, embracing hybridity – but its underlying intentions often hold steady. The criteria of legitimacy, the economies of visibility, the hierarchies of who gets to speak and who gets to be seen – they persist.

Perhaps the point isn’t to transform the stage, but to let the stage transform us. And that, let’s be honest, can’t be scheduled in the press release. 


You may also like...