Venus, by Janina Rajakangas. © Tani Simberg

review, article

From teenage girls’ songs to medieval saints’ torture at Moving in November, Helsinki

Read Icon Read
Time Icon Pink 15 min
Venus, by Janina Rajakangas. © Tani Simberg
S pink identity

On the social, spiritual, mundane and existential realities of living in a female body

The latest edition of the annual Helsinki-based Moving in November festival featured Venice Biennale awardees, along with a show co-created by Finnish teenagers. As usual, taking over city venues outside the local dance cradle Tanssin Talo (Dance House), the festival attempted to spread the word of experimental dance during the darkest time of the year. Featuring, among others, internationally renowned pieces like Alessandro Sciarroni’s Save the Last Dance for Me, Marlene Monteiro Freitas’ Bacchae – Prelude to a Purge, and Cherish Menzo’s DARKMATTER, the program managed to formulate a diverse approach to dance, both culturally and aesthetically. Here, though, I take a closer look at women’s stories that were danced through the program, discussing three pieces that captivated my attention the most.

I’m on fire

Venus by Janina Rajakangas and her magical collaborators made me cry both times I saw it. It was premiered in 2022 during the Baltic Circle festival at Villa Salin, run by Finnish feminist association Naisiasialiitto Unioni, and shown again in Mad House at the last Moving in November edition. Starting as a dialogue between a mother and her teenage daughter, the piece grew into a touching and forceful performance by four teenagers (Natalia Foster, Mea Holappa, Seela Merenluoma, and Volta Rajakangas-Moussaoui), reflecting on the issues of young girls’ eroticisation and how their self-image is affected by beauty norms and digital communication.

Developed through thorough research in collaboration with the performers, the piece unfolds between two modes of girls’ self-expression: one shaped by visual culture dominated by the male gaze, encompassing both classical references (such as the nod to Botticelli) and more recent popular and digital influences; and another, more raw, sincere, and unpredictable. Both modes are part of the process of discovering one’s subjectivity as a girl and a woman, but the latter requires more support and courage to become visible and claim its space. Instead of merely serving as a site of representation, the entire piece functions as a safe space for these raw expressions to emerge and become public.

Perhaps that’s why Venus was performed in cosy and ‘almost private’ settings both times: it feels as if we are invited into someone’s living room to witness an intimate ritual among four girlfriends. Seated in a circle on the floor around burning candles, they quietly begin reciting the qualities of a ‘good girl’: ‘Honest, gentle, kind, receptive, quiet, humble,’ the turn passing from one to another, creating a magical spell. As their voices grow louder and more forceful, it becomes evident that the ‘good girl’ qualities aren’t inherently ‘bad’; they only stifle individuality when imposed and used to control and limit self-expression. By playing with different modes of vocalisation, it seems the girls take control of these qualities, using them when appropriate and setting them aside when not needed.

The ritual unfolds into singing and dancing. ‘Hello darkness, my old friend’ from Simon & Garfunkel’s Sound of Silence is the first line performed by the girls, holding together the truthfulness of teenage sorrows. At the same time, it carries the touch of ‘posing’ for the media – as a ‘sad girl’ image can be one of those ready-made and desirable online. It’s hard to distinguish between ‘being real’ and performing what’s desired, especially in those gentle years before ‘coming of age.’ We tend to become whatever we are asked to perform and often find comfort, empowerment, and joy in ‘fitting in’ until we feel the urge to express ourselves differently, and suddenly we’re not accepted anymore.

The dramaturgy of Venus oscillates between these polarities, as the girls seem to find joy in ‘showing off’ when posing for an imaginary camera. Recognisable ‘cool girl’ poses from teenage posters encompass different acceptable ways of being an adolescent female: heart-shaped fingers, kissing postures, punkish middle-finger ‘fuck you’ gestures turns out you can make a dance out of these signs, of these symbols.

What pushes the performers out of those learnt modes of self-expression is improvised dancing, touch, screaming and stories of harassment spoken out loud. We see them exceeding the imposed behaviours when they get together and gently rest on one another while singing. Or when their dancing becomes furious and disorganised (the powerful final solo by Natalia Foster left me trembling). Or when their recitals grow into screaming. Or when they get ‘Angry, dopey, dramatic, problematic, intimidating, trouble-making, delusional, not funny, too much, too little, shit-faces, slow-paced, like everyone, like no one, crazy, loud, unstable’ – when the spell changes its tune.

And then the Venus appears.


S pink identity
Venus, by Janina Rajakangas. © Tani Simberg
Venus, by Janina Rajakangas. © Tani Simberg

In her essay on Rajakangas’s piece, Helsinki-based researcher and curator María Villa notices:

An adult but a virgin, wringing the seawater from her hair, modestly covering herself. She is the fairness of her flesh, an epitome of innocence and frailty, ripe for the visual pleasure of the beholder. But her story seems to stop there. Being born is enough; no ageing, learning, or acting in the world is envisioned. Being that perfect, naive body and being displayed and loved is already an accomplishment.

Quietly gathering in one corner of the room around Seela Merenluoma, portraying Venus, the rest of the girls construct an image from Botticelli’s iconic painting – with falling fake blond hair and a few shell-shaped pillows. A few spectators sitting nearby are asked to hold the pillows for ‘the background’… Does it mean that we all unintentionally support this framing of female presence? However, this silent culmination gives birth to another narrative. ‘Hey, beautiful’, ‘Are you alone?’, ‘Send me a picture’, ‘It’s just a picture’, ‘You’re so little’… Coming from the girls’ mouths, the words of internet harassment become more and more violent, until, in an attempt to find shelter – but also seemingly covered with shame – the girls crawl under a blanket, creating some kind of a tent, and start loudly reciting the dirtiest texts they received online. Again, it’s important that they say those out loud by themselves, but also that they spit it out in anger, so that the shame, fear, and confusion don’t take over and get stuck in the bodies.

At some point, they start singing Bruce Springsteen’s I’m on Fire (1984):

Hey little girl, is your daddy home?
Did he go and leave you all alone? Mhmm
I got a bad desire
Oh, oh, oh, I’m on fire.

Dreamy, sweet, and nostalgic – this melodic and catchy hit, honoured by many cover versions, sounds almost creepy when put on the lips of the ‘baby girl’. It appears again, as background music, in the final scene that happens outside. Making a straw man out of a few sticks, blue jeans, and a white T-shirt, the girls burn it in a metal barrel while dancing a simple, funny, and even childish line dance facing the audience that has followed them out. Does this background music ‘sing us to sleep’ and reconcile with reality? Combined with the ritual of figurativey ‘setting the child abuser on fire,’ it definitely looks like a playful act of revenge. Although this ending was gently criticised for ‘demonising the male figure who is perceived only as a predator,’ I think that in this scenario (child molesting) the piece ends in the most legitimate way. Yes, the process of healing relationships between genders and generations is certainly one of the most important tasks of our days – but that is already a different story and a different performance.

Submit and ascend

But how about healing your relationship with God as a woman in medieval Europe? In Submission Submission by Bryana Fritz, the focus is on the religious aspect of women’s history. Rather than treating Christianity as solely oppressive to women, Fritz explores the stories of medieval female saints who submitted to God within the patriarchal structure of the traditional church. Despite surrendering to external pressures, these saints found ways to resist and spiritually ascend – often using their bodies as sites of inconceivable suffering and transformation.

Each year, Fritz creates a new 15-minute scene portraying a female saint, each taking specific artistic forms to reflect the woman’s story. Each performance of the piece presents four scenes selected from this evolving catalogue. At the Caisa cultural centre, the four saints were Hildegard of Bingen, Catherine of Siena, Christina of Bolsena, and Joan of Arc. Gathering the audience in the lobby, Fritz comes down in a loose white shirt and explains that during the show she’s going to give her flesh and voice for those women to come to life.

Thus, Hildegard is portrayed with the fragments of the writings on her revelations and the experience of being taken by the higher power. Since, as she wrote, ‘The mystery of God hugs you in its all-encompassing arms,’ her story is embodied in a seemingly delirious yet strictly controlled dance improvisation. (As one of the audience members shared with me, ‘the crazy robot dance was impressive.’) In this portrayal, she reminds one of a puppet, or rather a moving vessel furiously channeling the holy presence of God. Catherine’s portrait is a monologue and a pop song in conversation with Jesus. Christina of Bolsena takes the stage in a punk rock-like musical performance. Meanwhile, Joan of Arc’s story is portrayed through an erotic combo: readings with a lesbian porn movie projected on the stage background.

The overall structure of the project mirrors a medieval codex, allowing access to random parts of the story. Despite the absence of the overall literal plot, the piece employs formal and critical tools to tell captivating stories. Fritz draws inspiration from hagiography, the writings of saints’ lives, embracing the persuasive tales of levitation, miracles, and heavenly exchanges. The piece takes those testimonies at face value with no intention to deconstruct but with a desire to embody them. Since the body would, in many cases, be the main site of their self-overcoming, asceticism and access to the transcendental, Fritz takes those bodily stories of the saints and wraps their inconceivable adventures into contemporary imagery.

Bryana Fritz, Submission Submission. © Michiel Devijver
Bryana Fritz, Submission Submission. © Michiel Devijver

Contrary to the recent emphasis on body safety and comfort in contemporary dance, the Middle Ages saw the body’s integrity questioned. The saints in Submission Submission achieved true enhancement through extreme bodily states, akin to contemporary body horror movies. This alternative perspective runs counter to the prevailing trend of performances focused on self-care, offering a radical exploration of freedom and body ownership.

One example from the show depicts the story of Christina of Bolsena, a virgin who faces persecution for her faith. Demanded by her father to become a pagan priestess but once visited by angels who turn her to Christianity, she suffers endless tortures for her faith – placed in a furnace, tortured on a wheel, thrown in water, ripping of her breasts – all of which she survives. One of her perpetrators demands her tongue to be cut off, so she throws it into his face, blinding him in one eye. In a scene representing this story, Fritz portrays a furious punk star defiantly stretching a fake tongue to unrealistic lengths, before spitting it out in an act of resistance.

Even though we tend to think of Christianity as solely oppressing the body, these holy adventures are all electrified by sexual tension. Christina is a virgin and Christ’s bride whose ‘purity’ stays untouched while her body is repeatedly torn apart by men, but their actions turn against themselves. Catherine’s monologue turns into a confessional pop song in which she picks one audience member to be Jesus and begs him to lift his shirt so she could ‘see his cut’ and suck his power. Joan of Arc’s portrait, dominated by explicit erotic imagery, highlights another aspect of the contact with the higher powers: through sensuality and the vitality of pleasure.

Altogether this masterful piece does three important things: it takes religion out of its secular disapproval and shows it as a way of empowerment for women, it introduces amazing female characters who are not part of the mainstream feminist agenda, and it finds ways to tell their stories in compelling, critical but also extremely entertaining and accessible ways.

Time of work

Finally, Mike by Silver Lion awardee (2017) and an amazing Canadian performer Dana Michel, is a durational three-hour performance that deals with questions of work in relation to time. But it also turned out to be a piece about the audience’s expectations, the work of attention and our relationships with the event of the spectacle itself.

Mike is a performance you can’t fully see. Moreover, you need to make an effort to observe at least some of its parts. At first glance, the space for the show seems to be organised in a more or less traditional way. There are some objects on the ground (pieces of paper, a carton, a record player) and the audience sits on the few chairs or on the floor around and in front of them. However, it will take more than two hours of waiting for the centre of attention to be activated by the performer. By that time, the audience will have lost its appetite for culmination, since the overall logic of the piece has put the spectators in a very different, non-peak bodily state.

The show indeed starts with long moments of suspense, as Michel, dressed in a slightly old-fashioned brown suit and appearing very busy with something personal, but completely disinterested in the spectators, doesn’t rush to appear in front of our eyes. She takes the back door and starts her routines in the lobby which the audience has just left. The movement material recalls feminist ‘maintenance art’: it’s mostly routines looking like job responsibilities but also daily activities like brushing teeth and moving objects. The viewers can stay at their initial places, waiting for the laborious and seemingly meaningless actions to reach their gaze, or they can follow Michel through Caisa’s corridors, or look for the performer in the corners of that huge space.


Dana Michel, MIKE. Photo © Carla Schleiffer
Dana Michel, MIKE. Photo © Carla Schleiffer

It seems the artist is making fun of our hunger for action, spectacle and meaning, as it is always satisfied by some kind of non-expressive drill. For sure, the very process of hunting makes the ‘findings’ more valuable. Nevertheless, Michel doesn’t seem to be aiming to make us ‘see the extraordinary in the mundane.’ Rather, she is creating the space of specific sensibility where the logic of time changes, becomes slower, and more dispersed. This approach is reminiscent of ‘landscape’ or ‘non-peak’ dramaturgy that pushes us to question what kind of ‘action’, ‘climax’, ‘confirmation’ or ‘result’ of our everyday routines we are expecting to see. What if this boring time spent in our bodies called ‘living’ gets more attention than the choreography of dopamine kicks?

Paradoxically, this piece, dealing with ‘background’ labour, the labour of maintenance, of the mundane, of keeping things going, usually associated with ‘invisible’ female work, creates space for concentration, contemplation and, in the end, rest – if the spectators manage to turn their attention to their own perception in good time. It also can teach us about pacing, and to see how our big achievements are always made of small prosaic actions. However, this very contemplation is definitely a privilege of creative labour, and this privilege is, unfortunately, never available for those whose time does not really belong to them.

*

I’ve chosen to get deeper into three works that from different angles deal with social, spiritual, mundane, and existential realities of living in a female body, but I’d like to underline that the overall program concentrated on the diversity of bodies and aesthetic expression on stage rather than solely on gender. As the festival’s artistic director, Kerstin Schroth writes in her pre-note, ‘Looking at societies that slowly, but steadily shift towards the right, re-installing gender separation and racism,’ the curatorial task is to continue insisting on the questions of equal representation, care, intimacy, and justice. ‘We are just not there yet’, says Schroth, and although the same kind of questions appears again and again in experimental dance festivals’ agendas, maybe instead of endlessly searching for conceptual novelty, we need to learn to concentrate on being persistent in our demands for societal change. 


Location Icon
07-17.11.2023, Helsinki, Finland
You may also like...